Contract Administration & Modifications

Post-award contract administration procedures, modification processes, performance monitoring, and closeout requirements for SBIR Phase III contracts.

Post-Award Contract Administration Overview

Post-award contract administration generally follows standard FAR Part 42 procedures for surveillance, inspection, payment, and closeout.

A key distinction for SBIR Phase III is that CICA requirements were met upon entry into the SBIR program; therefore, modifications to scope and ceiling do not require a justification, as required for other contracts.

Key Distinction for SBIR Phase III Modifications

No J&A Required

Per 15 U.S.C. §638(r)(4) and SBA Policy Directive Section 4(c)(5), there is no statutory limit on the number, duration, or dollar value of Phase III modifications.

Scope modifications (No J&A needed)

  • Add new tasks or deliverables
  • Remove or reduce tasks
  • Adjust performance standards
  • Change technical approach

Ceiling increases (No J&A needed)

  • Increase contract value
  • Add funding for new capabilities
  • Extend period of performance
  • Scale services up or down

Contracting Officer Discretion:

However, contracting officers retain discretion within available funding. Modifications must: be within general scope of original contract, have funding available, be in government's best interest, and be properly documented.

FAR Part 42 Procedures

Contract Surveillance

COR Responsibilities:

  • • Monitor contractor performance against PWS
  • • Implement QASP
  • • Review deliverables for technical adequacy
  • • Document surveillance results
  • • Recommend acceptance or rejection

Surveillance Methods:

  • • Monthly deliverable reviews
  • • Quarterly performance assessments
  • • Site visits (as required)
  • • Technical reviews with SMEs
  • • Stakeholder feedback collection

Inspection & Acceptance

Inspection:

  • • Verify deliverables meet requirements
  • • Check technical accuracy and completeness
  • • Validate data sources and methodology
  • • Confirm professional quality standards
  • • Assess timeliness

Acceptance/Rejection:

  • • COR recommends acceptance
  • • CO makes final decision
  • • Document in contract file
  • • Trigger payment or request correction

Payment Processing

Invoice Submission:

  • • Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) system
  • • Monthly invoicing
  • • Supporting documentation (CPFF CLIN)

Invoice Review & Payment:

  • • COR reviews for accuracy
  • • Validates work performed
  • • CO approves payment
  • • Processed through DFAS
  • • Typically 30 days from receipt

Modification Process

1

Modification Request

  • • Contractor or Government initiates
  • • Description of proposed change
  • • Cost/schedule impact analysis
  • • Justification for change
2

Government Review

  • • Technical review by COR
  • • Cost analysis
  • • Funding availability check
  • • Determine if within scope
3

Negotiation (if applicable)

  • • Discuss technical approach
  • • Negotiate cost/price
  • • Agree on schedule
  • • Finalize terms
4

Modification Issuance

  • • Prepare modification
  • • Obtain required approvals
  • • Execute modification
  • • Notify contractor
  • • Update contract file

Bilateral Modifications (Both parties agree)

  • • Scope changes
  • • Ceiling increases
  • • Schedule adjustments
  • • Technical approach changes

Unilateral Modifications (CO authority)

  • • Administrative changes
  • • Exercise of options
  • • Funding changes (within scope)
  • • Definitization

Performance Monitoring

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

Systematic method to monitor contractor performance and ensure PWS requirements are met.

Performance Standards

StandardMetricTarget
TimelinessOn-time delivery rate> 95%
QualityFirst-time acceptance rate> 90%
ResponsivenessResponse time to requests24hrs (urgent), 5 days (routine)
AccuracyError rate in deliverables< 5%

QASP Elements: Performance standards (from PWS), surveillance methods, surveillance frequency, acceptable quality levels, documentation requirements

Monthly Activities

  • • Review all deliverables
  • • Monitor cost accumulation (CPFF CLIN)
  • • Check invoice accuracy
  • • Document surveillance results

Quarterly Activities

  • • Comprehensive performance assessment
  • • Trend analysis
  • • Issue identification and resolution
  • • Performance counseling (if needed)

Annual Activities

  • • Complete CPARS evaluation
  • • Option period exercise recommendation
  • • Lessons learned documentation

Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)

Assessment Frequency:

  • Annual evaluations required
  • Interim evaluations for option period decisions
  • Final evaluation at contract completion

Assessment Areas:

  • • Technical performance
  • • Schedule adherence
  • • Cost control
  • • Management effectiveness
  • • Small business utilization (if applicable)

CPARS Ratings:

ExceptionalVery GoodSatisfactoryMarginalUnsatisfactory

Closeout Procedures

Technical Closeout

  • • Verify all deliverables received and accepted
  • • Confirm all technical requirements met
  • • Obtain final reports
  • • Archive deliverables

Financial Closeout

  • • Final invoice processing
  • • Cost reconciliation (for CPFF)
  • • Close out funding
  • • Final payment

Administrative Closeout

  • • Complete final CPARS
  • • Document lessons learned
  • • Archive contract file
  • • Release bonds (if any)
  • • Close contract in system

Deliverable Archive

Required archives: All monthly, quarterly, annual reports; all software deliverables; all documentation; correspondence file; performance evaluations

Duration: Per FAR and agency-specific records retention requirements

Best Practices

Proactive Communication

  • • Regular status meetings
  • • Early identification of issues
  • • Collaborative problem-solving
  • • Clear expectations

Documentation

  • • Document all significant events
  • • Maintain correspondence file
  • • Track modifications
  • • Archive decisions and rationale

Performance Management

  • • Address issues promptly
  • • Provide constructive feedback
  • • Recognize exceptional performance
  • • Use CPARS effectively

Data Rights Management

  • • Verify proper marking
  • • Protect SBIR data appropriately
  • • Train personnel
  • • Monitor compliance

Related Resources

Questions or Support

Navaide

solutions@navaide.com619-415-0038

UEI: HZCDXJV7M8Z9 | CAGE: 7M3J9